Skip to main content

Liquidation Process in Hifi's RWA Ecosystem

Overview

In Hifi's real-world asset (RWA) lending model, a third-party Lending Partner (Traditional Lender) borrows capital from the Hifi Protocol (DAO) to lend to an end Borrower who pledges a real asset as collateral. The lending partner holds a security interest in the Borrower's collateral (making the partner the "Secured Party" in the security agreement with the Borrower). If the Borrower defaults, the lending partner must enforce the collateral off-chain and repay the Hifi Protocol. Below is a high-level summary of how liquidation works, including default triggers, Secured Party rights, Borrower waivers, collateral disposal, proceeds distribution, and the on-chain vs off-chain interplay.

Event of Default -- Triggers

An Event of Default is triggered by various breaches or failures by the Borrower. Key triggers include:

  • Loan Payment Default: Any default by the Borrower on the loan (the "Note") -- e.g. failing to pay interest or principal as agreed -- constitutes an Event of Default under the Security Agreement. In practice, if the Borrower misses payments or the loan matures unpaid, it's a default event.
  • Covenant Breach: A material breach of any important provision in the security agreement by the Borrower (for example, violating terms around the collateral) is a default trigger.
  • False Representations: If any representation or warranty made by the Borrower (e.g. about ownership of the asset) was materially false when made or becomes false, that is a default event.
  • Cross-Default on Related Agreements: Default under related obligations -- for instance, if there are guarantors who default under their guarantee agreements -- also triggers a default.
  • Bankruptcy/Insolvency: If the Borrower becomes insolvent or enters bankruptcy or similar proceedings (e.g. making an assignment for benefit of creditors, or a receiver is appointed over the Borrower's property), it is an Event of Default.

In short, any failure to meet the loan terms or any event indicating the Borrower's inability to pay will put the loan in default.

Secured Party's Rights Upon Default

Once an Event of Default occurs, the Secured Party (the lending partner) has broad rights to enforce the loan and take control of the collateral. Upon default:

  • Acceleration and No Further Notice: The Secured Party can typically declare the entire loan due immediately. The Borrower has generally waived any requirement of prior demands or extra notices, so the Secured Party doesn't need to wait or formally demand repayment again before acting.
  • Possession of Collateral: The Secured Party can take possession of or control over the collateral. The security agreement and applicable law (e.g. the Utah Uniform Commercial Code) allow the Secured Party to seize the collateral once default happens, possibly without court process if it can be done peacefully.
  • Exercise of Legal Remedies: The Secured Party may exercise all remedies available under law -- this includes foreclosing on the collateral and selling it, as well as suing the Borrower or Guarantors for the debt if needed​. They can enforce any rights in the loan documents (the Note, the security agreement, guarantees) through court action (for example, seek a court order for specific performance or a judgment for the debt).
  • Option, Not Obligation, to Liquidate Immediately: The Secured Party has the option to pursue any remedy (they can choose the timing and method). Not enforcing immediately doesn't waive their rights -- they can delay or negotiate, and still later insist on full rights. Any leniency is not a permanent waiver. In essence, they have full discretion on how and when to enforce once default occurs.

These rights ensure the Secured Party can act decisively to secure repayment, either by liquidating collateral or by legal action against the Borrower (or both). The lending partner is contractually responsible for liquidating the Borrower's assets in default to repay the Hifi Protocol​.

Borrower's Waivers of Rights

The Borrower, as part of the security agreement, agrees to give up certain rights and formalities to streamline enforcement. Notable waivers include:

  • Notice and Presentment: The Borrower waives rights to various notices and demands. This means the Secured Party is not required to give advance notice of default or ask again for payment before taking action (except any minimum notice required by law). For example, the Borrower waives formal presentment, protest, or notice of dishonor. In practice, once default happens, the lender can move to seize/sell collateral without lengthy warnings.
  • Demand and Grace Periods: The Borrower waives any right to insist that the lender be "diligent" or prompt in enforcing rights. The Secured Party's delay or lack of immediate action can't be used by the Borrower as a defense. The borrower also can't claim they weren't formally asked to cure the default -- those requirements are waived.
  • Objections to Disposal: To the extent permitted by law, the Borrower waives rights to object to how the collateral is disposed. They essentially agree the Secured Party can sell or deal with the collateral as needed (in a commercially reasonable manner) without interference. Any statutory notice of sale that can be waived is waived, meaning the Borrower might not get a lengthy advance notice of a sale beyond what the law absolutely requires.
  • "Marshalling" or Choice of Remedies: The Borrower often waives any right to demand which assets are sold first or how the Secured Party should apply payments. The Secured Party can choose the order and method of liquidation without the Borrower directing them to exhaust other remedies first.
  • Deficiency Defense: The Borrower waives defenses regarding their obligations -- for example, they can't easily escape a deficiency (owing the remaining debt after collateral sale) by claiming the lender failed to do something (except gross misconduct). They remain liable for any shortfall.

Bottom line: the Borrower relinquishes procedural rights that might slow down liquidation. This allows the Secured Party to act fast and decisively after default, with minimal hurdles or required warnings.

Collateral Liquidation Process

When a default occurs, the liquidation of collateral is handled by the Secured Party (the DAO's lending partner) in a manner outlined by the agreements (and law). Key points about the process:

  • Timing: Liquidation can occur promptly after default. Since the Borrower waived extra notice, the Secured Party can move quickly to sell the asset once an Event of Default is in effect. There isn't a fixed waiting period beyond any baseline legal requirement. This swift action is crucial to recover funds before collateral value deteriorates further.
  • Method of Sale: The Secured Party may sell or dispose of the collateral publicly or privately. They have flexibility to choose the method that will maximize value or speed. For example, they might hold a public auction or negotiate a private sale with a buyer. There's no requirement that the sale be on-chain or via an open auction; it will likely be an off-chain process (e.g. selling a car through an auction house or a private buyer, selling real estate via a broker).
  • Notice Requirements: Any notice of the sale will be given as required by law (if applicable), but the Borrower has agreed not to require more than that. In commercial transactions, the lender typically must give "reasonable notice" to the debtor before a public sale or a private sale (unless that's been effectively waived for non-consumer collateral). In this case, the Borrower cannot insist on lengthy notice. The Secured Party might still give a notice of sale (to comply with any mandatory law or to avoid disputes), but the process won't be drawn out longer than necessary.
  • Who Can Buy: The collateral can be sold to any buyer, including potentially the Secured Party or the Hifi DAO (or an affiliate), if permitted. The goal is to get the best price to satisfy the debt. The agreements and UCC law usually allow the Secured Party to purchase the collateral at a public auction, and even at a private sale if the collateral is of a kind with a readily ascertainable market value. In practice, this means if no outside buyers are willing to pay a fair price, the lender (or an entity on behalf of the DAO) could acquire the asset themselves to later sell when feasible. There are no restrictions barring the DAO or its agents from ultimately taking ownership of the asset through the liquidation, as long as the procedures are commercially reasonable.
  • Commercial Reasonableness: While not explicitly asked, it's implied that any sale must be commercially reasonable (a general UCC requirement). This means the Secured Party should make a genuine effort to get a fair market price for the collateral under the circumstances. They don't have to maximize beyond the debt owed, but they can't intentionally fire-sell it for far too low a price just to quickly be done -- doing so could open disputes. In essence, the sale method, timing, and conditions should be within reason to fetch a fair value.

During liquidation, the lending partner is essentially converting the physical asset to cash. The legal agreements empower the partner to do this sale efficiently after default.

Allocation of Sale Proceeds

After the collateral is sold, the money obtained from the sale is distributed according to the agreements (and standard practice):

  • Expenses First: First, the costs associated with the repossession and sale are deducted. This includes any reasonable fees for storage, auctioneer or broker fees, legal fees, and other expenses the Secured Party incurred in enforcing its rights. The security agreement usually allows the Secured Party to recover these costs from the sale proceeds (so that enforcing the loan doesn't cost them out of pocket).
  • Debt Repayment: Next, the outstanding loan amount is paid. The Secured Party will apply the proceeds to the debt owed by the Borrower. This includes the principal amount of the loan and any accrued interest, and possibly any late fees or default interest as per the note. Essentially, the sale proceeds go to make the Secured Party (and ultimately the Hifi protocol) whole on the loan. The lending partner will use the proceeds to repay the Hifi DAO's loan that it had taken to fund the Borrower. (By contract, the partner must turn over the recovered amount to the Hifi Protocol to settle the partner's obligation for that borrower's draw.)​
  • Surplus to Borrower: If the sale yields more money than needed to cover the debt and costs (i.e. there is a surplus), that surplus belongs to the Borrower. The Borrower gets any remaining equity. For example, if the Borrower owed $500k and the collateral sold for $600k net, the extra $100k would go back to the Borrower (after all obligations are satisfied). The Secured Party/DAO doesn't keep the excess -- the agreements and law require returning surplus to the Borrower or any junior lienholders, preserving the Borrower's equity in the asset.
  • Deficiency (Shortfall): If the sale does not cover the full amount owed, this results in a deficiency. The Borrower remains liable for the deficiency balance (unless the loan was explicitly non-recourse). The Secured Party can pursue the Borrower (and any guarantors) for the remaining amount. In practice, the lending partner could seek a money judgment for the unpaid balance. However, from the Hifi Protocol perspective, the lending partner is on the hook to repay the DAO regardless -- meaning the partner may have to absorb that loss or pursue the Borrower themselves.

This waterfall ensures that enforcement proceeds first go to cover the debt to the Hifi DAO (plus any enforcement costs), and only after that does the Borrower keep anything extra. It aligns incentives: the Borrower doesn't lose more value than necessary (they get back any extra after debt), and the DAO's interests are protected by being first in line to be paid from collateral proceeds.

On-Chain vs. Off-Chain Enforcement

Liquidation in Hifi's RWA loans involves a combination of on-chain triggers and off-chain legal actions. Unlike typical crypto loans, it's not an automated on-chain auction based on price oracles. Instead, the process bridges on-chain smart contracts with traditional legal enforcement:

  • On-Chain (Smart Contract) Role: The Hifi lending protocol on-chain is used to originate the loan to the lending partner using a tokenized representation of the collateral (an RWA token). The smart contract keeps track of the loan terms (principal, interest, maturity) and the posted collateral token. However, if a default occurs (e.g. the partner fails to repay on time), the smart contract itself cannot liquidate the real asset. There is no instant liquidation auction via smart contract as with crypto collateral. The smart contract locks the collateral token so it can't be withdrawn, effectively freezing the position, while enforcement happens off-chain. The Hifi DAO's governance and smart contracts oversee this process -- for example, the DAO could pause the partner's ability to draw more funds if a default is detected. But the heavy lifting is off-chain.
  • Off-Chain (Legal) Role: The actual default enforcement is carried out off-chain via legal agreements and processes. The lending partner (or an appointed agent/trustee) will use the Security Agreement and related legal documents to seize and sell the physical asset. This involves real-world actions: for example, repossessing a car title or foreclosing on a property through the courts if required, then selling the asset for cash. These actions are governed by contract law and UCC provisions, not by the blockchain. The off-chain process is necessary because real-world assets can't be automatically liquidated by code -- they require human/legal intervention to convert to cash. The legally binding contracts ensure that the partner must carry out these steps and hand over the proceeds as agreed​.
  • Coordination: There is a close coordination between on-chain and off-chain. The smart contract provides transparency (it knows how much was lent and what collateral token is held) and can enforce certain rules (like not allowing the collateral token to move to anyone except an authorized liquidator). Meanwhile, the off-chain side handles valuation, finding a buyer, and the transfer of ownership of the asset in the real world. Once the asset is sold and cash is obtained off-chain, the lending partner uses that cash to repay the on-chain loan (by paying back the hTokens that were initially lent). This closes out the on-chain position. In essence, the protocol trusts the off-chain process to reclaim value, backed by legal recourse if the partner fails to perform.

Importantly, the liquidation is not trustless or automatic -- it's "manually" managed by the lending partner under legal obligations, rather than by smart contract code alone​. This hybrid approach is a design choice to handle RWAs: on-chain mechanisms handle what they can (fund accounting, token custody), and off-chain mechanisms handle what they must (enforcing on physical assets).

Role of the Hifi DAO and Smart Contracts

The Hifi DAO and its smart contracts play a critical oversight and backstop role in the liquidation process:

  • DAO as Ultimate Creditor: The Hifi DAO (via the protocol) is the entity that provided the funds, so it is the ultimate party to be repaid. The DAO sets up the partnership such that it has a security interest in the collateral through the lending partner. This means if the partner does not fulfill their obligations, the DAO (or a DAO-designated agent) can step in and enforce the collateral rights directly. The DAO's interest is protected by this legal framework -- it ensures the DAO isn't just trusting the partner blindly, but has recourse to the assets.
  • Governance and Monitoring: The Hifi DAO, through governance votes, initially approves adding a particular RWA collateral and entering into the partnership. The DAO also sets parameters like loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and monitors the health of these RWA loans. If the collateral value were to drop or if there are signs of trouble, the DAO could intervene (for example, demanding more collateral or initiating a default proceeding via the legal agreements).
  • Smart Contract Controls: The smart contracts enforce the rules set by the DAO -- e.g., they won't allow the lending partner to borrow more than the collateral value limit, and they enforce the repayments on-chain. In case of default (like the loan passes its due date without repayment), the contract could flag that condition. The contracts can prevent the partner from withdrawing collateral. However, the smart contract cannot liquidate the asset itself; it relies on the partner to make the repayment. If the partner fails to do so, the contract essentially holds an unusable collateral token -- that's when the DAO must use the legal route to resolve it.
  • Legal Recourse if Partner Fails: The DAO retains legal recourse against the lending partner through the Lending Partner Agreement. These agreements are legally binding and enforceable. If the partner does not liquidate the collateral properly or fails to turn over the proceeds, the DAO can take legal action. For example, the DAO (or its designated entity) could enforce the assignment of the collateral, effectively stepping into the shoes of the lending partner to seize and liquidate the asset. In other words, the DAO is not left hanging -- it can sue or otherwise claim the collateral thanks to the contracts in place.
  • No Automatic On-Chain Auction: It's worth highlighting that the DAO's involvement replaces what would normally be an on-chain liquidation auction in DeFi. Instead of a smart contract instantly auctioning the collateral to the highest bidder when conditions are breached, the DAO relies on its partner (and ultimately legal rights) to get the money back. This means the DAO and community must carefully vet and trust the lending partner. The partner's deep expertise in the asset class and legal commitment are what back the loan, rather than an algorithmic auction. The DAO thus performs due diligence up front and continuous oversight, rather than hands-off automated enforcement.

In summary, the Hifi DAO uses a mix of smart contract controls and legal agreements to manage RWA liquidations. The lending partner (Secured Party) handles the actual collateral sale off-chain and is contractually bound to repay the protocol​. If anything goes wrong, the DAO (via its designees and legal contracts) can enforce its rights on the collateral as a last resort​. This ensures that even though the process isn't trustless, the DAO's interests are protected by law. The structure leverages the best of both worlds: on-chain transparency and governance, and off-chain legal enforceability, to make real-world assets viable as collateral in a DeFi context.